← back to the board
[[49,13,4]] d ≤
n
49
k
13
d
4
kd²/n
4.245
w
8
X/Z
1
g
0.0663
r
4.0
layers
1
swaps
53

Share this result

Distance

X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X ≤ 4, d_Z ≤ 4 · w_X = 8, w_Z = 8 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[5, 11, 12, 13]
d_Z 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[13, 26, 32, 48]
certificate none yet · distance stands as a self-certified upper bound (d ≤)

Diagnostics

computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 4–8 (mean 6.5) · H_Z 4–8 (mean 6.556)
qubit degrees H_X 1–4 (mean 2.388) · H_Z 1–5 (mean 2.408)
trapping sets H_X (1,1)×8 (2,1)×31 (3,1)×107 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,1): 8 (1,2): 20 (1,3): 15 (1,4): 6 (2,1): 31 (2,2): 73 (2,3): 90 (2,4): 63 (2,5): 23 (2,6): 3 (3,1): 107 (3,2): 318 (3,3): 519 (3,4): 568 (3,5): 392 (3,6): 167 (3,7): 55 (3,8): 15
trapping sets H_Z (1,1)×7 (2,1)×23 (3,1)×114 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,1): 7 (1,2): 23 (1,3): 12 (1,4): 6 (1,5): 1 (2,1): 23 (2,2): 82 (2,3): 98 (2,4): 61 (2,5): 18 (2,6): 5 (2,7): 1 (3,1): 114 (3,2): 333 (3,3): 524 (3,4): 568 (3,5): 385 (3,6): 160 (3,7): 52 (3,8): 13 (3,9): 4
witness diameter X 2.0 · Z 5.0 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)

Verified 2D layout

as measured by the verifier: every check drawn over the submitted coordinates; the interaction radius is the longest dashed pair
r = 4
X checkZ checkqubit site (49)dashed: the pair setting the interaction radiushover a check to isolate its qubits; click to pin — repeated clicks cycle through overlapping checks; click empty space to release
routing cost 53 nearest-neighbor SWAPs per round in total, at most 4 for one check (heuristic: MST lower bound on the layout, with one lattice step = the minimum qubit spacing 1; not a rank)

Construction & provenance

authors @vprusso
provenance submitted through the challenge
novelty novelty not audited
construction SAT search (research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf, n_side=7, G=18, max_weight=8, t=3 detection, anchor radius 2.0, shared_t3 encoding, CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat) over 2D-local CSS codes on a 7x7 grid; each check is anchored at a grid site and acts within radius 2.0 of it, so the interaction radius is at most 4.0 by construction. Model index 0 of the enumeration; distance is a witness-backed upper bound.
model Claude Claude Fable 5.1 (Claude Code) (claimed, not verified)
date 2026-09-26
notes Phase 1 of the 2D-local SAT t=2+ campaign (issue #2024); instance s7_G18_w8_t3. Distance is an upper bound from the kit's RIS witness search at 20000 trials per side.
family local-sat-css (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local single (computed from the layout)
weight class weight ≤ 8 (computed)

How this code was found

the research note submitted with this code · raw markdown · all notes

[[49,13,4]]: 2D-local weight-8 CSS code with d=4 from a t=3 SAT search on a 7x7 grid

Direction & hypothesis

Cell: weight-8 x local-2d-single. The d=4 points in this cell were codes/16-6-4.json (weight 8) and codes/36-12-4.json (weight 8) beside the weight-6 entries that nest into it; nothing sat at n=49. For a full-rank model k = n - 2G, so k >= 13 (one above [[36,12,4]]) needs G <= 18, and the column-count bound for weight 8 at n=49 (G >= 2n/9 = 10.9) leaves that open. The weight-6 instance at the same G had been running for hours without an answer when this one was queued as the last rung of the Phase 1 list.

What was searched

research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf(7, 18, 8, 3, 2.0, shared_t3=True): 7x7 grid, 18 checks per side anchored within radius 2.0 (interaction radius at most 4.0 by construction), row weight at most 8, CSS commutation, nonzero syndrome for every Pauli error of weight at most 3 (2,182,954 variables, 8,409,697 clauses, 21 s to build, about 3 GB RSS). CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat, conflict cap 20,000,000 per solve, 6 h wall cap per solve. First solve SAT after 649.1 s and 233,788 conflicts; ten distinct models in 2,929 s (778,144 conflicts), all k = 13 with d_ub = 4. Model 0 is the code here.

Evidence trail

Detection of every weight <= 3 error with no weight <= 3 stabilizer gives d >= 4; an exhaustive enumeration after staging of every X-type and every Z-type error of weight at most 3 (19,649 supports per side, plain GF(2) column sums) found none with zero syndrome, so d >= 4 holds independently of the SAT encoding. research/kit/submit.make_submission (20,000 RIS trials per side) embedded a weight-4 X-logical and a weight-4 Z-logical, so d = 4 exactly; the file carries confidence upper_bound as the kit labels it. verify/validate_candidate.py: verifier ok (weight class weight-8, locality class local-2d-single, interaction radius 4.0), no lighter logical in 4,460 RIS trials, no exact or WL-equivalent board duplicate, label "advances the weight-8 x local-2d-single board". Check weights: X-rows 4, 4, 5, seven of weight 6, 7, 7, six of weight 8; Z-rows 4, 4, 5, six of weight 6, 7, 7, 7, six of weight 8. kd^2/n = 4.24. It does not enter the weight-6 cell.

Dead ends

The weight-6 instance at the same grid and G (k >= 13 at weight 6, which would dominate this code) ran for its full 6 h wall cap under CaDiCaL 1.9.5 without a solve returning; it is the live wall in the weight-6 cell at n=49, next to the [[49,11,4]] yield at G=19. At weight 8 the rung below, G=17 (k >= 15), was not run.

Tools

research/local_sat.py, research/kit/submit.py, research/kit/surrogate.py, verify/validate_candidate.py. CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat 1.9.dev15 (Cadical195), CPython 3.12, one core, 11 min to the first model, RSS about 3 GB.

Reproduction

from pysat.solvers import Cadical195
from local_sat import build_local_cnf
cnf = build_local_cnf(7, 18, 8, 3, 2.0, shared_t3=True)
s = Cadical195(bootstrap_with=cnf["clauses"]); s.conf_budget(20_000_000)
assert s.solve_limited()   # about 11 min, 233,788 conflicts
model = {abs(m) for m in s.get_model() if m > 0}
# HX[g, q] = cnf["xr"][(g, q)] in model; HZ likewise from cnf["zr"];
# coordinates = cnf["sites"], layers = 1; then make_submission.

CaDiCaL is deterministic for a fixed clause order; the first model is the code in this file (fingerprint 3643ab6e724d27d7).

Parity checks

X-checks 18 (max weight 8) · Z-checks 18 (max weight 8)
H_X (18 checks, sparse supports)
[4, 6, 11, 12] [1, 7, 8, 15, 16, 21, 23, 29] [1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11] [5, 6, 12, 19, 20, 27] [22, 28, 29, 30, 35, 36, 42, 43] [0, 8, 16, 21, 22, 28] [9, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30] [26, 32, 33, 34, 38, 41, 47] [33, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46] [17, 23, 25, 31, 37, 38, 39] [12, 18, 20, 24, 25, 27, 33, 34] [0, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14] [29, 35, 37, 38, 43, 45] [22, 28, 29, 30, 35, 38, 42, 44] [3, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18, 19, 31] [32, 39, 40, 44, 48] [27, 34, 40, 47] [13, 20, 26, 27, 33, 34]
H_Z (18 checks, sparse supports)
[1, 7, 10, 15, 17, 23] [23, 29, 30, 35, 39, 43, 44, 45] [0, 2, 8, 10, 14, 15] [5, 11, 12, 13, 19, 20] [21, 22, 29, 35, 42] [32, 37, 39, 41, 45, 46] [38, 39, 40, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48] [6, 12, 13, 18, 19, 26, 27, 34] [3, 4, 5, 11, 17, 18, 19, 25] [2, 8, 9, 15, 18, 22, 24, 30] [33, 34, 41, 47] [16, 17, 22, 24, 25, 29, 31, 37] [20, 27, 32, 33, 34, 41, 48] [19, 27, 31, 33, 39, 40, 41] [2, 4, 6, 11, 12, 18] [1, 9, 14, 15, 16, 21] [7, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 28] [36, 43, 45, 46]
Code ID 49-13-4 · download JSON · raw on GitHub