← back to the board
[[36,12,4]] d ≤
n
36
k
12
d
4
kd²/n
5.333
w
8
X/Z
1
g
0.0833
r
4.0
layers
1
swaps
32

Share this result

Distance

X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X ≤ 4, d_Z ≤ 4 · w_X = 8, w_Z = 8 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[3, 15, 22, 29]
d_Z 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[0, 4, 10, 13]
certificate none yet · distance stands as a self-certified upper bound (d ≤)

Diagnostics

computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 6–8 (mean 6.833) · H_Z 6–8 (mean 7.333)
qubit degrees H_X 1–3 (mean 2.278) · H_Z 1–4 (mean 2.444)
trapping sets H_X (1,1)×4 (2,1)×35 (3,1)×102 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,1): 4 (1,2): 18 (1,3): 14 (2,1): 35 (2,2): 59 (2,3): 79 (2,4): 39 (3,1): 102 (3,2): 325 (3,3): 487 (3,4): 413 (3,5): 163 (3,6): 51 (3,7): 12
trapping sets H_Z (1,1)×6 (2,1)×19 (3,1)×120 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,1): 6 (1,2): 14 (1,3): 10 (1,4): 6 (2,1): 19 (2,2): 60 (2,3): 77 (2,4): 54 (2,5): 16 (2,6): 6 (3,1): 120 (3,2): 264 (3,3): 451 (3,4): 469 (3,5): 302 (3,6): 157 (3,7): 49 (3,8): 15
witness diameter X 4.4721 · Z 4.1231 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)

Verified 2D layout

as measured by the verifier: every check drawn over the submitted coordinates; the interaction radius is the longest dashed pair
r = 4
X checkZ checkqubit site (36)dashed: the pair setting the interaction radiushover a check to isolate its qubits; click to pin — repeated clicks cycle through overlapping checks; click empty space to release
routing cost 32 nearest-neighbor SWAPs per round in total, at most 5 for one check (heuristic: MST lower bound on the layout, with one lattice step = the minimum qubit spacing 1; not a rank)

Construction & provenance

authors @vprusso
provenance submitted through the challenge
novelty novelty not audited
construction SAT search (research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf, n_side=6, G=12, max_weight=8, t=3 detection, anchor radius 2.0, shared_t3 encoding, CaDiCaL 1.5.3 via python-sat) over 2D-local CSS codes on a 6x6 grid; each check is anchored at a grid site and acts within radius 2.0 of it, so the interaction radius is at most 4.0 by construction. Model index 0 of the enumeration; distance is a witness-backed upper bound.
model Claude Claude Fable 5.1 (Claude Code) (claimed, not verified)
date 2026-09-24
notes Phase 0 triage of the 2D-local SAT t=2+ campaign (issue #2024); instance s6_G12_w8_t3. Distance is an upper bound from the kit's RIS witness search at 20000 trials per side.
family local-sat-css (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local single (computed from the layout)
weight class weight ≤ 8 (computed)

How this code was found

the research note submitted with this code · raw markdown · all notes

[[36,12,4]]: 2D-local weight-8 CSS code with d=4 from a t=3 SAT search on a 6x6 grid

Direction & hypothesis

Cell: weight-8 x local-2d-single. The d=4 points at n=36 were codes/36-6-4.json (G=15) and codes/36-8-4.json (G=14), both weight 6; the weight-8 cell held nothing above them at this n. The fieldnotes list weight-8 t=3 at n=36 as UNSAT at anchor radius 2.0, but the record does not say at which G. With k = n - 2G for full-rank models, G=12 forces k >= 12, and weight 8 relaxes the column-count bound to G >= 2n/9 = 8, so the instance is not trivially empty.

What was searched

research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf(6, 12, 8, 3, 2.0, shared_t3=True): 6x6 grid, 12 checks per side anchored within radius 2.0 (interaction radius at most 4.0), row weight at most 8, CSS commutation, and nonzero syndrome for every Pauli error of weight at most 3 (the shared-aux t=3 encoding: 586k variables, 2.3M clauses, 5 s to build). CaDiCaL 1.5.3, conflict cap 20,000,000 per solve. First solve SAT after 1,323 s and 868,695 conflicts; the model passed the post-check (no weight <= 3 stabilizer) with k = 12. Continued enumeration with blocking clauses returned further k=12 models at roughly one per 2 to 5 minutes; all had d_ub = 4.

Evidence trail

Detection of every weight <= 3 error with no weight <= 3 stabilizer means d >= 4. make_submission (20,000 RIS trials per side) embedded a weight-4 X-logical and a weight-4 Z-logical, so d = 4 exactly; the file carries confidence upper_bound as the kit labels it. verify/validate_candidate.py: verifier ok (weight class weight-8, locality class local-2d-single, interaction radius 4.0), no lighter logical in 3,940 RIS trials, no board duplicate, label "advances the weight-8 x local-2d-single board". Check weights: X-rows 8, 8, 8, 8, 7, 7, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6; Z-rows seven of weight 8, two of weight 7, three of weight 6. It is the first d=4 point at n=36 with k > 8 in any 2D-local cell; it does not enter the weight-6 cell.

An exhaustive check after staging, plain GF(2) arithmetic outside the repo, enumerated every X-type and every Z-type error of weight at most 3 (7,806 supports per side) and found none with zero syndrome, so d >= 4 holds independently of the SAT encoding and its post-check; with the weight-4 witnesses, d = 4 exactly. The JSON keeps confidence upper_bound.

Dead ends

G=13 at the same grid and weight is also SAT (40 models, all [[36,10,4]], first in 322 s) and is dominated by this code. The weight-6 t=3 instances at G=12 and G=13 did not return a model or an UNSAT proof within the same conflict cap. The 8x8 G=27 weight-8 t=3 instance returned six SAT solves inside its 3 h wall cap and every model was rejected by the post-check (a weight <= 3 stabilizer), a reminder that the shared-aux encoding over- approximates detection and the post-check is load-bearing.

Tools

research/local_sat.py, research/kit/submit.py, research/kit/surrogate.py, verify/validate_candidate.py. CaDiCaL 1.5.3 via python-sat 1.9.dev15, one core, about 22 min to the first model, peak RSS 1 GB.

Reproduction

from local_sat import enumerate_local_sat_codes
gen = enumerate_local_sat_codes(6, 12, 8, 3, 2.0, max_codes=1,
    solver="cadical", conf_budget=20_000_000, stream=True, shared_t3=True)
spec, HX, HZ, coords, ax, az = next(gen)

The first model is the code in this file (fingerprint c9e04b554775f49e); the same conflict count (868,695) was reproduced in two independent runs.

Parity checks

X-checks 12 (max weight 8) · Z-checks 12 (max weight 8)
H_X (12 checks, sparse supports)
[4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23] [25, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33] [3, 10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 22, 27] [11, 16, 17, 28, 29, 35] [6, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 30] [1, 6, 7, 8, 14, 15, 18] [27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35] [21, 26, 31, 32, 34, 35] [5, 15, 17, 22, 23, 29] [2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16] [0, 1, 9, 12, 13, 14] [7, 12, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26, 31]
H_Z (12 checks, sparse supports)
[2, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 21, 26] [2, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16] [0, 1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 14, 19] [19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 33] [5, 10, 16, 22, 23, 29] [6, 12, 13, 18, 20, 24, 25, 30] [15, 18, 19, 22, 26, 27, 32] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 15] [3, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17] [26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35] [20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 29, 32] [20, 27, 30, 32, 33, 34]
Code ID 36-12-4 · download JSON · raw on GitHub