← back to the board
[[32,8,4]] d =
n
32
k
8
d
4
kd²/n
4.0
w
8
X/Z
1
g
0.0123
r
4.2426
layers
2
swaps
82

Share this result

Distance

X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X = 4, d_Z = 4 · w_X = 8, w_Z = 8 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[7, 14, 21, 28]
d_Z 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[1, 8, 22, 31]
certificate exact, d = 4 · scipy/HiGHS MILP
X: no logical < 4 exists; Z: no logical < 4 exists

Diagnostics

computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 8 · H_Z 8
qubit degrees H_X 2–6 (mean 4.0) · H_Z 2–6 (mean 4.0)
trapping sets H_X (1,2)×16 (2,2)×16 (3,2)×96 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,2): 16 (1,6): 16 (2,2): 16 (2,4): 56 (2,6): 144 (2,8): 16 (2,10): 32 (3,2): 96 (3,4): 288 (3,6): 1072 (3,8): 672 (3,10): 560
trapping sets H_Z (1,2)×16 (2,2)×16 (3,2)×96 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,2): 16 (1,6): 16 (2,2): 16 (2,4): 56 (2,6): 144 (2,8): 16 (2,10): 32 (3,2): 96 (3,4): 288 (3,6): 1072 (3,8): 672 (3,10): 560
witness diameter X 3.6056 · Z 3.6056 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)

Circuit tier

syndrome-extraction memory circuits committed under circuits/32-8-4/ · canonical noise recipe, 4 rounds, stim 1.16.0
d_circ ≤ 4 (min over bases; penalty-only, clamped to ≤ d)
d_circ^X 4 · fault-set witness of 4 mechanisms (claimed upper_bound)
witness fault set (mechanism indices in the committed .dem, 4)
[303, 394, 721, 1152]
d_circ^Z 4 · fault-set witness of 4 mechanisms (claimed upper_bound)
witness fault set (mechanism indices in the committed .dem, 4)
[169, 170, 3083, 3217]
ler/round (X) 0.0166 95% CI [0.0153, 0.018] · 632/104 shots · decoder bposd-cs-10 at p=0.001
ler/round (Z) 0.0155 95% CI [0.0142, 0.0168] · 590/104 shots · decoder bposd-cs-10 at p=0.001

Verified 2D layout

as measured by the verifier: every check drawn over the submitted coordinates; the interaction radius is the longest dashed pair
r = 4.243
X checkZ checkqubit site (16)2 qubits stacked (2 layers)dashed: the pair setting the interaction radiushover a check to isolate its qubits; click to pin — repeated clicks cycle through overlapping checks; click empty space to release
routing cost 82 nearest-neighbor SWAPs per round in total, at most 4 for one check (heuristic: MST lower bound on the layout, with one lattice step = the minimum qubit spacing 1; not a rank)

Construction & provenance

authors Lin, Hsiang-Ku and Pryadko, Leonid P.
provenance literature baseline
construction Two-block group algebra (2BGA) code over C_8 x C_2: a={1, r2}, b={1, s r5, s r4, r2, s r7, s r6} (Lin & Pryadko, arXiv:2306.16400, Table 1).
model classical construction (no AI model)
date 2023
notes Literature baseline (arXiv:2306.16400, Lin & Pryadko, 28 Jun 2023). Two-block group algebra code reconstructed from the published group presentation; distance d=4 taken from the paper's Table 1 and certified by an explicit non-stabilizer witness on each side (regenerated via the research kit's RIS search). Literature novelty confirmed by manual cross-check: arXiv:2306.16400 Table 1 explicitly reports the [[32,8,4]] parameters with W=8. The verifier's 'literature novelty UNVERIFIED' label is by-design (validate_candidate.py performs no literature lookup) and is intentionally not overridden. Layout certification: a verifier-accepted honest bilayer layout (stacked 4x4 grid, 2 qubits per site, layers=2, measured interaction radius ~4.243) was found by @mathysrennela (Aug 2026). It earns the code the local-2d-bilayer class and makes the site's geometric efficiency g = 4kd^2/(n rho^2 r^4) computable. Code authorship unchanged; layout credit to @mathysrennela.
family 2BGA coset (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local bilayer (computed from the layout)
weight class weight ≤ 8 (computed)

How this code was found

no research note was staged with this submission — notes are requested for new submissions (notes/README.md)

Parity checks

X-checks 16 (max weight 8) · Z-checks 16 (max weight 8)
H_X (16 checks, sparse supports)
[0, 12, 16, 19, 21, 23, 25, 28] [1, 13, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 29] [2, 14, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 30] [3, 15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 26, 31] [0, 4, 16, 20, 23, 25, 27, 29] [1, 5, 17, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28] [2, 6, 18, 22, 25, 27, 29, 31] [3, 7, 19, 23, 24, 26, 28, 30] [4, 8, 17, 20, 24, 27, 29, 31] [5, 9, 16, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30] [6, 10, 17, 19, 22, 26, 29, 31] [7, 11, 16, 18, 23, 27, 28, 30] [8, 12, 17, 19, 21, 24, 28, 31] [9, 13, 16, 18, 20, 25, 29, 30] [10, 14, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26, 30] [11, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 27, 31]
H_Z (16 checks, sparse supports)
[0, 4, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 20] [1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 21] [1, 2, 6, 11, 13, 15, 18, 22] [0, 3, 7, 10, 12, 14, 19, 23] [1, 3, 4, 8, 13, 15, 20, 24] [0, 2, 5, 9, 12, 14, 21, 25] [1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 22, 26] [0, 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 23, 27] [1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 24, 28] [0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 13, 25, 29] [3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 14, 26, 30] [2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 15, 27, 31] [0, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 28] [1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 17, 29] [2, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 18, 30] [3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 19, 31]
Code ID 32-8-4 · download JSON · raw on GitHub