← back to the board
[[32,10,4]] d ≤
n
32
k
10
d
4
kd²/n
5.0
w
6
X/Z
1
g
0.0154
r
4.2426
layers
2
swaps
37

Share this result

Distance

X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X ≤ 4, d_Z ≤ 4 · w_X = 6, w_Z = 6 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[5, 11, 17, 27]
d_Z 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed upper_bound)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[0, 1, 13, 19]
certificate none yet · distance stands as a self-certified upper bound (d ≤)

Diagnostics

computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 6 · H_Z 6
qubit degrees H_X 1–3 (mean 2.062) · H_Z 1–4 (mean 2.062)
trapping sets H_X (1,1)×7 (2,1)×20 (3,1)×101 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,1): 7 (1,2): 16 (1,3): 9 (2,1): 20 (2,2): 62 (2,3): 56 (2,4): 20 (3,1): 101 (3,2): 246 (3,3): 294 (3,4): 252 (3,5): 116 (3,6): 20 (3,7): 6
trapping sets H_Z (1,1)×6 (2,1)×26 (3,1)×94 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,1): 6 (1,2): 19 (1,3): 6 (1,4): 1 (2,1): 26 (2,2): 60 (2,3): 48 (2,4): 18 (2,5): 4 (3,1): 94 (3,2): 243 (3,3): 307 (3,4): 218 (3,5): 111 (3,6): 27 (3,7): 8 (3,8): 1
witness diameter X 3.1623 · Z 2.2361 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)

Verified 2D layout

as measured by the verifier: every check drawn over the submitted coordinates; the interaction radius is the longest dashed pair
r = 4.243
X checkZ checkqubit site (16)2 qubits stacked (2 layers)dashed: the pair setting the interaction radiushover a check to isolate its qubits; click to pin — repeated clicks cycle through overlapping checks; click empty space to release
routing cost 37 nearest-neighbor SWAPs per round in total, at most 5 for one check (heuristic: MST lower bound on the layout, with one lattice step = the minimum qubit spacing 1; not a rank)

Construction & provenance

authors @vprusso
provenance submitted through the challenge
novelty novelty not audited
construction SAT search (research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf with the grid site list repeated 2 times, n_side=4, G=11, max_weight=6, t=3 detection, anchor radius 3.5, shared_t3 encoding, CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat) over bilayer 2D-local CSS codes: 2 qubits per site of a 4x4 grid (layers=2), each check anchored at a grid site and acting within radius 3.5 of it, so the interaction radius is at most 7.0 by construction. Model index 0 of the enumeration; distance is a witness-backed upper bound.
model Claude Claude Fable 5.1 (Claude Code) (claimed, not verified)
date 2026-09-26
notes Phase 2 (bilayer) of the 2D-local SAT t=2+ campaign (issue #2024); instance b4_G11_w6_t3. Distance is an upper bound from the kit's RIS witness search at 20000 trials per side.
family local-sat-css (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local bilayer (computed from the layout)
weight class weight ≤ 6 (computed)

How this code was found

the research note submitted with this code · raw markdown · all notes

[[32,10,4]]: bilayer 2D-local weight-6 CSS code from a t=3 SAT search, two qubits per site of a 4x4 grid

Direction & hypothesis

Cell: weight-6 x local-2d-bilayer. At n <= 32 and d >= 4 the weight-6 bilayer cell was led by codes/30-8-4.json (k = 8, one layer) beside codes/25-7-4.json, codes/24-6-4.json (two layers), codes/18-4-4.json, and codes/16-4-4.json. For a full-rank model k = n - 2G, so G=11 forces k >= 10; the column-count bound G >= 2n/(w+1) = 9.1 leaves G=10 (k >= 12) as the last rung that can hold a t >= 2 code.

What was searched

research/local_sat.py build_local_cnf with the grid site list repeated twice (each of the 16 sites of the 4x4 integer grid carries two qubits at the same coordinate, n = 32; in code, local_sat._grid_sites is replaced by a version that yields every site twice, the one-line layers extension of the single-layer encoder), G=11 checks per side anchored at a grid site and acting within anchor radius 3.5 of it (check diameter at most 7.0, the bilayer cap; on the 4x4 grid the farthest sites are 4.24 apart, so the radius constrains nothing and the instance is the weight-bounded CSS search at n = 32 with a bilayer-honest layout by construction), row weight at most 6, CSS commutation, nonzero syndrome for every Pauli error of weight at most 3. CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat, conflict cap 20,000,000 per solve, 6 h wall cap per solve, CNF streamed into the solver (395,008 variables). First solve SAT after 481.4 s and 529,455 conflicts; ten distinct models in 1133.4 s (1,477,695 conflicts), all k = 10 with d_ub = 4. Model 0 is the code here.

Evidence trail

Detection of every weight <= 3 error with no weight <= 3 stabilizer gives d >= 4; an exhaustive enumeration after staging of every X-type and every Z-type error of weight at most 3 (5,488 supports per side, plain GF(2) column sums) found none with zero syndrome, so d >= 4 holds independently of the SAT encoding. research/kit/submit.make_submission (20,000 RIS trials per side, the duplicated coordinates and layers = 2) embedded a weight-4 X-logical and a weight-4 Z-logical, so d = 4 exactly; the file carries confidence upper_bound as the kit labels it. verify/validate_candidate.py: verifier ok (weight class weight-6, locality class local-2d-bilayer, two qubits per site, measured interaction radius 4.24), no lighter logical in 3,780 RIS trials, no exact or WL-equivalent board duplicate, label "advances the weight-6 x local-2d-bilayer board". Check weights: X-rows eleven of weight 6; Z-rows eleven of weight 6. kd^2/n = 5.0. It raises k at (n <= 32, d = 4) in the weight-6 bilayer cell from 8 to 10; every check has weight exactly 6.

Dead ends

The rung below, G=10 (k >= 12), exhausted the 20,000,000-conflict cap in 13,056 s with neither a model nor an UNSAT proof, so k = 12 at d = 4 on this grid is open, not excluded; G=9 lies below the column-count bound (9.1) and is UNSAT without solving.

Tools

research/local_sat.py, research/kit/submit.py, research/kit/surrogate.py, verify/validate_candidate.py. CaDiCaL 1.9.5 via python-sat 1.9.dev15 (Cadical195), CPython 3.12, one core.

Reproduction

import local_sat
from pysat.solvers import Cadical195
local_sat._grid_sites = lambda side: [(float(x), float(y))
    for y in range(side) for x in range(side) for _ in range(2)]
s = Cadical195(bootstrap_with=[])
cnf = local_sat.build_local_cnf(4, 11, 6, 3, 3.5, sink=s, shared_t3=True)
s.conf_budget(20_000_000); assert s.solve_limited()
model = {abs(m) for m in s.get_model() if m > 0}
# HX[g, q] = cnf["xr"][(g, q)] in model; HZ likewise from cnf["zr"];
# coordinates = cnf["sites"] (each grid point twice), layers = 2.

CaDiCaL is deterministic for a fixed clause order; the first model is the code in this file (fingerprint c3a81cbed39009ad).

Parity checks

X-checks 11 (max weight 6) · Z-checks 11 (max weight 6)
H_X (11 checks, sparse supports)
[2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14] [4, 13, 17, 18, 19, 22] [2, 3, 7, 9, 10, 20] [6, 15, 20, 22, 25, 31] [8, 11, 27, 28, 29, 30] [0, 1, 5, 8, 21, 23] [1, 2, 9, 11, 12, 13] [14, 15, 17, 21, 27, 29] [8, 10, 12, 18, 20, 26] [12, 16, 23, 29, 30, 31] [10, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24]
H_Z (11 checks, sparse supports)
[1, 4, 6, 13, 15, 21] [11, 13, 19, 27, 29, 30] [2, 10, 12, 14, 28, 29] [8, 18, 22, 23, 25, 30] [0, 8, 17, 19, 26, 27] [2, 7, 9, 10, 24, 26] [1, 2, 7, 23, 25, 31] [5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 20] [3, 4, 14, 15, 18, 20] [3, 6, 7, 16, 24, 31] [4, 6, 17, 25, 27, 28]
Code ID 32-10-4 · download JSON · raw on GitHub