Distance
X/Z asymmetry 1 · d_X = 4, d_Z = 4 · w_X = 6, w_Z = 6 (max(d_X,d_Z)/min(d_X,d_Z); each side carries its own earned tier: = certified exact, ≤ witness upper bound)
d_X 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed exact)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[1, 7, 13, 19]
d_Z 4 · witness weight 4 (claimed exact)
witness operator (support, 4 qubits)
[1, 7, 13, 19]
certificate exact, d = 4 · scipy/HiGHS MILP
X: no logical < 4 exists; Z: no logical < 4 exists
Diagnostics
computed by the verifier from the parity checks, the layout, and the stored witnesses; shown as evidence, not used for ranking
girth H_X 4 · H_Z 4 (shortest cycle of each side’s Tanner graph; longer is friendlier to belief propagation)
check weights H_X 6 · H_Z 6
qubit degrees H_X 2–4 (mean 3.0) · H_Z 2–4 (mean 3.0)
trapping sets H_X (1,2)×12 (2,2)×24 (3,2)×108 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_X
(1,2): 12
(1,4): 12
(2,2): 24
(2,4): 78
(2,6): 60
(3,2): 108
(3,4): 360
(3,6): 616
(3,8): 72
(3,10): 24
trapping sets H_Z (1,2)×12 (2,2)×24 (3,2)×108 (smallest syndrome weight at each size, connected sets of up to 3 qubits)
full (size, syndrome weight): count census for H_Z
(1,2): 12
(1,4): 12
(2,2): 24
(2,4): 78
(2,6): 60
(3,2): 108
(3,4): 360
(3,6): 616
(3,8): 72
(3,10): 24
witness diameter X 2.0 · Z 2.0 (Euclidean support diameter of the stored distance witnesses in the layout; an upper bound on the exhibited logicals’ spread, not a minimum over all logicals)
Construction & provenance
authors Lin, Hsiang-Ku and Pryadko, Leonid P.
provenance literature baseline
construction Generalized bicycle (cyclic 2BGA) code over C_12: a(x) = 1 + x3, b(x) = 1 + x + x3 + x7.
model classical construction (no AI model)
date 2023-06-28
notes Parameters from the Lin-Pryadko 2BGA enumeration (arXiv:2306.16400, w=6 abelian/GB tier). Explicit polynomials reconstructed by exhaustive weight-6 GB search over C_12 with the repo research kit; distance proven exact by cutoff MILP (scipy/HiGHS). Seeded so the global frontier reflects the published state of the art (issue #52). 2D-local layout added 2026-07-27: simulated annealing over qubit-to-site assignments on a unit-spaced triangular grid (2 layers, capacity 1 per site per layer); measured interaction radius 2.645751 (bilayer); same code, same check matrices.
family generalized bicycle (a tag, not a ranking)
locality 2D-local bilayer (computed from the layout)
weight class weight ≤ 6 (computed)
Parity checks
X-checks 12 (max weight 6) · Z-checks 12 (max weight 6)
H_X (12 checks, sparse supports)
[0, 9, 12, 17, 21, 23]
[1, 10, 12, 13, 18, 22]
[2, 11, 13, 14, 19, 23]
[0, 3, 12, 14, 15, 20]
[1, 4, 13, 15, 16, 21]
[2, 5, 14, 16, 17, 22]
[3, 6, 15, 17, 18, 23]
[4, 7, 12, 16, 18, 19]
[5, 8, 13, 17, 19, 20]
[6, 9, 14, 18, 20, 21]
[7, 10, 15, 19, 21, 22]
[8, 11, 16, 20, 22, 23]
H_Z (12 checks, sparse supports)
[0, 1, 3, 7, 12, 15]
[1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 16]
[2, 3, 5, 9, 14, 17]
[3, 4, 6, 10, 15, 18]
[4, 5, 7, 11, 16, 19]
[0, 5, 6, 8, 17, 20]
[1, 6, 7, 9, 18, 21]
[2, 7, 8, 10, 19, 22]
[3, 8, 9, 11, 20, 23]
[0, 4, 9, 10, 12, 21]
[1, 5, 10, 11, 13, 22]
[0, 2, 6, 11, 14, 23]