arXiv:2609.37231 (Liang, Gu, Chen, Eisert, Wang, "Ultra-high-distance quantum memories from amplified qLDPC codes") tensors a base CSS code Q with a small "amplifier" code A through the central truncation of the tensor product of their chain complexes (the CSS tensor product of Audoux and Couvreur, arXiv:1512.07081). With the [[4,2,2]] amplifier a base [[n,k,d]] code with m_X + m_Z checks becomes [[4n + m_X + m_Z, 2k, 2d]]: the paper's Eq. (3) gives ceil(2 d) <= d' <= 2 d for every CSS base code with k > 0 (certified gain alpha = 2 = d_A), so the distance exactly doubles, while check weight only grows additively.
The paper's own instances ([[90,8,8]] and [[468,16,16]] from the [[18,4,4]] twisted-torus code, codes/18-4-4.json) are dominated on this board and its larger ones exceed the n cap. The hypothesis was that the *construction* still pays here: n grows 5x and kd^2/n only 1.6x, but the board is thin at n = 200–1000 for mid-k, weight <= 6 codes, so a theorem-backed doubling of a small frontier code lands on an empty part of the frontier.
triaged against the board's (n, k, d, w) Pareto frontier in its weight cell, with d' = 2 d_base taken from the theorem. 57 amplified codes were undominated, about 40 of them admissible.
verify/validate_candidate.py; all six passed. This entry isthe amplification of codes/40-10-4.json ([[40,10,4]], 2D-local bilayer layout, by @mathysrennela).
dominated, because the check weight climbs to 10–14 while n grows 25x.
certs/40-10-4.json certifies d = 4 exact for the base (CryptoMiniSat 5.14 SAT), so by the paper's Eq. (3) the amplified distance is exactly 8 if that bound holds.codes/18-4-4.json:100,000 RIS trials on [[90,8,8]] and 20,000 on [[468,16,16]] found nothing below 2 d_base.
lighter than 8; qldpc submit then re-searched witnesses on both sides and found weight 8 on each. The witnesses in the JSON are explicit product logicals, base witness (x) X_0 X_1 (resp. Z_0 Z_1) of the [[4,2,2]] code, placed in the Q_1 (x) A_1 register.
keep k fixed and multiply n by 7–25, so kd^2/n drops; only [[4,2,2]] improves it.
codes/90-8-10.json;[[468,16,16]] w=10 by codes/288-16-16.json and codes/240-16-20.json.
Claude Fable 5.1 in Claude Code. numpy for the tensor construction (about 20 lines of np.kron blocks, reproduced below); this repository's research/kit (css.compute_k, surrogate.distance_rand_witness, submit.make_submission), verify/validate_candidate.py and cli/qldpc.py. Under 15 minutes of laptop CPU for all six codes.
Let H_X (m_X x n), H_Z (m_Z x n) be the checks of codes/40-10-4.json and G_X = G_Z = [1 1 1 1] those of the [[4,2,2]] code (n_A = 4, one check per side). Data qubits, in this order: Q_1 (x) A_1 (4n), Q_2 (x) A_0 (m_X), Q_0 (x) A_2 (m_Z). With I_s the s x s identity:
H_X' = [[ kron(H_X, I_4), kron(I_mX, G_Z^T), 0 ], [ kron(I_n, G_X), 0, kron(H_Z^T, I_1) ]] H_Z' = [[ kron(I_n, G_Z), kron(H_X^T, I_1), 0 ], [ kron(H_Z, I_4), 0, kron(I_mZ, G_X^T) ]]
(rows of H_X' are Q_2 (x) A_1 then Q_1 (x) A_2; rows of H_Z' are Q_1 (x) A_0 then Q_0 (x) A_1). This gives n = 190, k = 20, max check weight 6. An X witness of weight 8 is {4q + a : q in S, a in {0, 1}} for S the X witness of the base entry; likewise for Z.