[[18,3,5]] — one-block palindromic cyclic stabilizer code X^a Z^b, weight 8

Direction & hypothesis

The general-stabilizer board's low-weight cells (w <= 8) held only a handful of small codes and the two Chamon baselines (kd^2/n = 4), while the higher-k entries have weight 32. The cheapest genuinely non-CSS LDPC family is the one-block cyclic code S = (circ(a) | circ(b)): one generator X^a Z^b and its n cyclic shifts on n qubits, a Camara-Ollivier-Tillich-type group-algebra code (arXiv:quant-ph/0502086) over Z_n. The shifts commute iff a b* + b a* = 0 (b*(x) = b(1/x)); that holds whenever a = g p and b = g q with p, q palindromic (p = p*) and g arbitrary, and for even n also after b -> x^(n/2) b. Then k = deg gcd(a, b, x^n - 1) and the check weight is |supp a u supp b|. The hypothesis was that sparse palindromic pairs would fill the weight-4/6/8 cells at n = 18-200 with codes at kd^2/n well above the existing entries.

What was searched

• All n from 17 to 200; p, q palindromic of weight <= 4 (p taken up to the multiplier

group Z_n^*), g in {1} u {1 + x^j}, both shift variants for even n, check weight <= 8. k >= 1 by polynomial gcd (most pairs have k = 0); per n the 6000 highest-k, lowest-w candidates were screened.

• Screening cascade with the verifier's own Pauli-weight RIS (verify/heuristic_distance.py):

8 trials (drop d < 5, and kd^2/n < 3 for n > 40), then 300 trials; kept only if not dominated on (n, k, d, w) by any stabilizer board entry or earlier find.

• Deep pass on every Pareto point: 20,000 RIS trials on each of two fresh seeds; for n <= 24 an exact enumeration of every Pauli below the claimed weight.

Evidence trail

• Screen: d <= 5 at 300 trials. Deep: 2 x 20,000 trials found nothing lighter (held).

qldpc submit re-searched (20,000 trials) and the filed witness has Pauli weight 5.

• Exact: enumeration of all Paulis of weight < 5 found no logical, so d = 5 exactly.
• Claim: d <= 5, witness-backed upper bound; the board's certifier does not minimise Pauli

weight, so no stabilizer entry is exact on the board.

Dead ends

• Two-generator and non-palindromic pairs were not searched; the family is exactly the

one above.

• Composite n (63, 68, ...) produce 50-80k k >= 1 candidates and dominate the run time; prime

n produce few and mostly k = 1 codes (the X_{i,i+1} Z_{i-j,i+j} weight-4 family, d up to 11 at n = 61).

• Candidates that screened at 300 trials and dropped under the deep pass were discarded;

the deep pass changed the distance of a minority of finds by one or two.

Tools

Claude Fable 5.1 in Claude Code; numpy; verify/heuristic_distance.py (Pauli-weight RIS), cli/qldpc.py, verify/. Laptop CPU, a few hours for the whole sweep.

Reproduction

n = 18; a(x) = x^7 + x^8 + x^10 + x^11; b(x) = 1 + x^6 + x^9 + x^12. Generator i (i = 0..n-1) is X on {i + e mod n : e in supp a} and Z on {i + e mod n : e in supp b} (both -> Y). S = (circ(a) | circ(b)); k = n - rank_2(S) = 3. Witness: X on [13, 14], Z on [6, 9, 15].