Target cell: unrestricted / weight-6 (the code has max check weight 5). The original aim was to beat the weight-5 [[192,4,16]] Lin-Pryadko 2BGA reconstruction submitted during the hackathon: n <= 192, k >= 4, d >= 16 at weight <= 5, strictly better on one axis.
A scan of the Lin-Pryadko catalogue (github.com/QEC-pages/2BGA-codes @ 403d194, both zip archives) found no weight <= 5 row that dominates [[192,4,16]]; it is the catalogue's best at n <= 192, k >= 4. Ordinary 2BGA over the catalogued groups is therefore mined out at this point, so the search moved to coset two-block codes (arXiv:2606.17268, research/kit/coset.py), which the catalogue does not cover. Only non-normal subgroups H were used: for normal H the coset code is an ordinary 2BGA over G/H, which the catalogue already enumerates up to order 100. The board held a single weight-5 coset code, [[96,4,10]], so this corner looked thin.
research/kit/group_algebra.py (no GAP): PSL(2,7),S4, A4, S3 and D5-D8 times cyclic groups, and every metacyclic C_n : C_k (one r per cyclic subgroup of units) of order m*|H| with m = 84..96 and |H| in {2,3,4}. 688 group specs.
one per conjugacy class, with [G:H] in 84..96. 759 (G, H) tasks.
b = {e, h}; b drawn from coset representatives of N_G(H)/H, since H itself acts trivially on the right. 1,500 + 750 random draws per task, max check weight capped at 5.
dropping anything below 14. About two hours on 15 worker processes.
Hits at weight 5 with k = 4 and d >= 14 after the 20,000-trial rung:
[[192,4,16]] 18 (ties the catalogue code, does not beat it) [[180,4,15]] 25 [[192,4,15]] 155 [[168,4,14]] 395 [[174,4,14]] 8 [[180,4,14]] 252 [[186,4,14]] 26 [[192,4,14]] 1032
No code reached d >= 16 below n = 192.
Deep ladder on 33 distinct [[168,4,14]] hits from a shorter pilot run (accelerated RIS, per side, lightest logical found):
100,000 trials 14 for all 33 1,000,000 trials 14 for all 33
None collapsed. The submitted code (D6 x Z28, below) was then packaged with research/kit/submit.py (witness search 20,000 trials, seed 168100) and passed verify/validate_candidate.py with refutation on (seed 276735675): no lighter logical, no exact duplicate, no WL-equivalent board entry, board-advancing. Two more hits from other parent groups (S3 x Z56 and C24 : C14) passed the same gate.
The claim is a witness-backed upper bound d <= 14 on both sides, not an exact distance.
Groups reachable without GAP and |H| <= 4 did not get d = 16 below n = 192.
was excluded rather than searched.
2 + 3 splits in the same budget.
Claude Opus 5 in Claude Code (desktop app) on a 16-core Windows machine. Repo tooling: research/kit (group_algebra.py, coset.py, css.py, surrogate.py, submit.py), verify/validate_candidate.py, and the gf2_fast accelerator built with MSVC. About two hours of sweep plus half an hour of deep checks.
import sys; sys.path.insert(0, "research/kit") from group_algebra import dihedral, cyclic_product, direct_product from coset import build_coset
mul = direct_product(dihedral(6)[0], cyclic_product(28)[0])[0] # |G| = 336 H = [0, 56, 182, 322] # order 4, non-normal, |N_G(H)| = 112 HX, HZ = build_coset(mul, H, a=[0, 270, 211], b=[0, 18]) # n = 168
Element index 28*i + j is (D6 element i, Z28 element j), with D6 elements in the order dihedral(6) returns them.