Cyclic generalized-bicycle codes at check weight 4 cover a wide blocklength range, and the board's coverage of that range is uneven: there are stretches of n where no entry sits near the (k, d) the family can reach. A broad randomized sweep over sparse polynomial pairs, screened against the live board before any expensive work, finds the gaps.
ring x^50 - 1 a(x) = x^0 + x^1 b(x) = x^0 + x^9 H_X = [circ(a) | circ(b)] H_Z = [circ(b)^T | circ(a)^T]
n = 2m, and k = 2 deg gcd(a, b, x^m - 1), computed by Euclid before any matrix work so that most draws are discarded for free.
One loop draws a ring size and a weight split, samples the two sparse polynomials, computes k by Euclid, and runs a cheap 60k-trial distance screen. A draw survives only if the resulting (n, k, d, w) is undominated on the live board snapshot. Surviving draws go through an escalating ladder of 400k, 2M and 8M random information-set trials, with the board comparison repeated at each rung so a candidate that collapses is dropped as soon as it stops being interesting.
General RIS over all 2m columns is close to blind to a logical supported entirely on one block. Such a vector u satisfies a(x) u(x) = 0 mod x^m - 1, which puts u in the ideal generated by h = (x^m - 1) / gcd(a, x^m - 1), so it can be searched directly in a space of dimension deg h rather than 2m. This matters: a previous submission of mine survived 150M general RIS trials at weight 74 and was then refuted by a weight-64 logical sitting entirely in one block, which the ideal search finds in seconds. Every candidate here is checked that way before the distance is believed, and any candidate whose single-block bound comes in below the ladder is dropped rather than submitted.
Witness search runs on each side separately, so a run that happens to find one side cannot leave the other without a witness. Both witnesses are re-checked directly against H: in the kernel of the opposite matrix, and outside the row space of its own.
Score kd^2/n = 2.0 at check weight 4. Undominated in its cell against the board at submission time.
The distance is an upper bound from witness search, not a proof. Literature novelty is unverified: cyclic GB codes are a classical family and these parameters may appear in the 2BGA literature.